Skip to content

introduces Response.json() static method #1462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

feugy
Copy link
Contributor

@feugy feugy commented Jan 3, 2023

📖 What's in there?

A new method has been added: static Response.json(data, init) to create a response that contains JSON (not to be confused with Response.prototype.json()).

All the details are in #1444

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2023

Thanks for the PR!

This section of the codebase is owned by @saschanaz - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged.

@feugy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feugy commented Jan 3, 2023

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Vercel"

@feugy feugy force-pushed the feat/response-json-static branch from d18f1a8 to f542c4a Compare June 2, 2023 09:49
@feugy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feugy commented Jun 2, 2023

@HolgerJeromin, I've re-based this PR since this static method has been implemented on Firefox, and is planned in release 115.

Despite the fact that is it not implemented in the MDN documentation yet, it is fully specified in the fetch spec.

I hope we can now consider adding it to Typescript types.

@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, I think we can have this now. The wrong URL is IMO tolerable, LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit f85d145 into microsoft:main Jun 2, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Merging because @saschanaz is a code-owner of all the changes - thanks!

@feugy
Copy link
Contributor Author

feugy commented Jun 5, 2023

Thanks a mil!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants